Saturday, October 25, 2025

The Dane and Chandler Families and the 1692 Andover Witchcraft Hysteria

An illustration of the hanging of a convicted witch

In my last post, I shared information about our Chandler ancestors, who emigrated from Bishop's Stortford, England to Roxbury, Massachusetts in 1637. The matriarch of that family, my 10th great-grandmother Annis Bayford Chandler, married as her second husband, John Dane, after the death of her first husband, William Chandler. This was not the only Chandler-Dane marriage.

In 1658, Annis' son William Chandler married John Dane's granddaughter, Mary Dane. Mary was the daughter of John's son John Dane, Jr. and his wife Eleanor Clark.

In 1690, at the age of 75, John Dane's son Francis Dane married Annis Chandler's daughter Hannah, who was then a widow of 60.

The Dane family, while related to me only via marriage, was at the center of the witch trials that plagued the Massachusetts towns of Salem and Andover in 1692. Theirs is such a fascinating story and historical connection that it is worth detailing here, even though the Danes are not biological relations.

Multiple descendants of my 10th great-grandparents William Chandler and Annis Bayford Chandler, and the children of my 9th great-grandfather John Chandler, were also caught up in the witchcraft accusations in Andover. Two were accused, and four leveled accusations that resulted in executions. 

This horrific time in American history had few heroes, but in Andover, Rev. Francis Dane, the stepson of Annis Bayford Chandler, rose to the occasion.

Rev. Francis Dane

Francis Dane in Andover, Massachusetts

Francis Dane was born in about 1615 in England, likely in Bishop's Stortford, and came to the American colonies with his parents, John Dane and Frances Bowyer, by 1639. The family settled in Roxbury, Massachusetts. As an adult, Francis moved from Roxbury to Andover, Massachusetts, located about 25 miles northwest of Roxbury. In 1641, he married Elizabeth Ingalls, the daughter of Edmund Ingalls and Annis Telbe. The Ingalls family settled in Lynn, Massachusetts after immigrating from England sometime between 1629-1632. 

Between 1641 and 1656, Francis and Elizabeth had six children together. Elizabeth died in 1676, at the age of 56. All six of their children were adults at that time. A year later, Francis married the widow Mrs. Mary Thomas, who died in 1689, after twelve years of marriage. The following year, he married Hannah Chandler, the widow of George Abbot. Less than two years after this marriage, Hannah and Francis found themselves at the epicenter of Andover's worst moments.

An aerial view of North Andover showing the North Parish Church. [Source]

The Church in Andover

Francis Dane was the minister of North Parish Church in Andover, Massachusetts. He was appointed to lead the church in Andover in 1648. He did so for 48 years, until his death in 1697, becoming one of the most important figures in Andover, and its moral center. However, as he aged, Andover's citizens began agitating for change.

... there is no record of any discord between Dane and his congregation from 1649 to 1680, although historian Sarah L. Bailey calls the reality of such a situation into question in her Historical Sketches of Andover. Whether flawless or not, it is evident that Dane was a highly respected and powerful member of the Andover community, comparable only to Dudley Bradstreet, former Governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Around 1680, church members began to complain about the capabilities of Dane and requested a younger, more vibrant minister for their church. In January of 1682, the congregation called the young Rev. Thomas Barnard, a recent graduate of Harvard and protege of Cotton Mather. Soon thereafter, the congregation stopped paying Dane's salary and gave Barnard a full salary. Dane petitioned the General Court in Boston, and the Andover church was required to pay Dane thirty pounds a year to share pastoral duties with Barnard. The church decided to pay Barnard fifty pounds a year, which was much less than Barnard expected, with the stipulation that when Dane retired or died, Barnard would receive the full eighty pounds annual salary. [source: History of Andover: from its Settlement to 1829 by Abiel Abbot]

The jostling for authority and salary meant Barnard and Dane started their relationship as opponents rather than colleagues. It must have been difficult for them to work together as real partners, as they were not being paid the same fee for their ministry. Barnard was young (just 22 in 1682), ambitious, and eager to assume full authority in Andover's church. Barnard had many supporters in town, but Dane hung onto his position and his prominent role in Andover, not ready to step aside. It was into this dynamic that the fear of witchcraft, ignited in nearby Salem Village, exploded in 1692.

Andover in 1886, nearly 200 years after the witchcraft hysteria

Martha Carrier, Smallpox, and Witchcraft

The first person to be accused of witchcraft in Andover was Martha Allen Carrier. Martha was Francis Dane's niece by marriage -- the daughter of his wife Elizabeth Ingalls' sister, Faith Ingalls Allen. Martha married Thomas Carrier in 1674 and settled in Billerica, Massachusetts. However, Thomas and Martha were embroiled in conflict there, and faced legal charges that they had engaged in fornication prior to their marriage (irrefutable, since Martha was seven months pregnant at their wedding). The Carriers were eventually asked to leave Billerica. Rumors of problematic behavior followed Thomas and Martha back to Andover in the mid-to-late 1680s, where they moved in with Martha's father. 

In Andover, Martha became known as difficult and argumentative. She engaged in conflict with neighbors. Then, in 1690, her family contracted smallpox. Martha, Thomas, and their five children survived the disease, but Martha's father, Andrew Allen, and her two brothers, Andrew and John, died, along with other members of the extended family. Ultimately, this outbreak killed thirteen people in Andover. Many already disliked Martha, and the smallpox outbreak made things worse. 

Martha's sister, Mary Allen, married a farmer named Roger Toothaker. Roger also practiced as a doctor, but he was more of a folk healer. Medical practices in the American colonies were very different than what we experience today. Roger would have primarily prescribed herbs and folk remedies to ill patients. Like others of his time, he was superstitious, and believed witchcraft responsible for many diseases. In the 1680s, Roger left his family in Billerica to set up a practice in Salem Village. At that time, what we think of as Salem was two towns: Salem Town, a prosperous coastal settlement, and Salem Village (now called Danvers), a poorer and less-populated agricultural area to the northwest of the town. In Salem Village, Toothaker ascribed many ailments to witchcraft, and claimed that he knew counter-magic to cure those ills, causing locals to view him with suspicion. The increasing concern about Roger Toothaker in Salem Village in the early 1690s also cast aspersion on his sister-in-law, Martha Carrier. 

Then, in late 1691, Martha got into an argument with her neighbor, Benjamin Abbot. There was a tiff about their property line and where livestock grazed. After this argument, Abbot became ill, and he accused Martha of cursing him, calling her a witch. This lit match, tossed on top of Andover's struggle for church authority, and the witchcraft accusations surfacing in nearby Salem Village, ignited a frenzy. 

An illustration of a witch trial in progress, created in 1892. [Source: Library of Congress]

The Witch Trials Begin

In 1692, Francis Dane and Thomas Barnard were now ten years into their co-leadership of the community church. That February, accusations of witchcraft were made in Salem Village, and by March, arrests and a full-blown hysteria were in motion. The madness was poised to spread through surrounding communities, and in the spring of 1692, it did.

On May 28, 1692, Joseph Houlton and John Walcott of Salem Village filed a witchcraft complaint against Martha Carrier and ten other people: Elizabeth Fosdick, Wilmot Redd, Sarah Rice, Elizabeth Howe, John Alden, William Proctor, John Flood, Arthur Abbot, Mary Toothaker (Martha Carrier’s sister, the wife of Roger Toothaker), and Mary’s daughter, Martha Emerson.

Martha Carrier was taken to Salem Town, where she was examined by Judges John Hathorne and Jonathan Corwin. Several of the afflicted girls of Salem Village, including Abigail Williams, Elizabeth Hubbard, and Mary Walcott, were brought to the court and asked to testify as to whether Martha had harmed them with witchcraft. The girls accused Martha of tormenting them and forcing them to sign the devil’s book. Carrier denied all charges, calling the proceedings shameful and insisting, "...I am wronged. It is a shameful thing that you should mind these folks that are out of their wits." The girls then claimed Martha had killed 13 people in Andover, likely referring to the smallpox outbreak that locals blamed on her family in 1690. When one of the girls fell into fits, the judges ordered Martha bound, and the record noted that the afflicted then felt “sudden ease.” Following her examination, Carrier was indicted on two counts of witchcraft and returned to jail. Francis Dane spoke in Martha's defense, saying that she was simply a victim of gossip.

Martha Carrier's children were also targeted. Her sons, Richard and Andrew, were imprisoned in Salem Town. Fellow prisoner John Proctor wrote to Governor William Phips claiming that the boys had been tortured in jail, brutally tied at their necks until blood came from their noses. Richard and Andrew later testified against their mother, surely in an attempt to save their own lives. Martha's seven year old daughter Sarah was also accused and jailed. She confessed under duress, claiming that her mother had forced her into witchcraft. 

As Martha sat in prison, Elizabeth Ballard of Andover fell gravely ill with a mysterious fever, and when doctors could not help her, her husband Joseph Ballard sought an alternative solution. He brought two of the afflicted girls from Salem Village, possibly Ann Putnam and Mary Walcott, to Andover. Suspecting that Elizabeth was cursed by witches, Joseph hoped the girls could reveal those causing his wife’s illness. At a meeting hosted by Thomas Barnard, the girls accused residents, including Ann Foster and William Barker, of witchcraft. They also pointed the finger at Ann Foster's daughter, Mary Lacey, and her granddaughter, also named Mary Lacey. All were subsequently arrested and sent to trial in Salem Town, marking the start of a wave of accusations. When William Barker was brought in for questioning, his niece, Mary Barker, and his wife's niece, Mary Marston, were also detained. They all confessed to witchcraft and accused others of coercing them, surely in an attempt to save themselves, and this led to further arrests. The accused deflected blame onto family members and neighbors, and made colorful confessions, hoping to shift the focus of authorities.

By August 1692, the Salem witchcraft hysteria had fully engulfed Andover. On August 11, Francis Dane's daughter, Abigail Dane Faulkner, was arrested on charges of witchcraft. On August 25, residents Mary Osgood, Eunice Frye, Deliverance Dane, Sarah Wilson, and Abigail Barker were accused of witchcraft. Abigail Barker was Francis Dane's granddaughter. Deliverance Dane was his daughter-in-law, the wife of Nathaniel Dane. On August 29, Dane's daughter Sarah Dane Johnson was arrested, along with her daughter, Sarah. Three more of Dane's grandchildren were arrested in the weeks that followed.

In response to the accusations, Andover town selectmen arranged "touch tests," bringing the afflicted girls from Salem Village to Andover to identify supposed witches. The touch tests were a method used to determine the guilt of those accused. Magistrates ordered the afflicted girls to touch an accused person. If their fits stopped or lessened upon that touch, it was taken as proof that the accused was the witch harming them. The idea was based on the belief that a witch’s power flowed physically to their victim, and that direct contact could interrupt the spell. 

Francis Dane was opposed to the touch tests, but Thomas Barnard was in favor. Reports differ as to whether Barnard helped make arrangements for the touch tests, and how involved he was in the proceedings, but he was undoubtedly supportive of the process. Barnard’s perspective was influenced not only by the ongoing trials in Salem Town, but the sway of Cotton Mather, whose writings and sermons during that time period justified aggressive action against witchcraft as a divine duty. Barnard had been at Harvard at the same time as Cotton, and would certainly have been familiar with his theology. In contrast, Francis Dane was an outspoken critic of the proceedings. Having lived through earlier witchcraft accusations in the region, he cautioned against the use of spectral evidence and the reliance on coerced confessions. Unfortunately, Andover was too far gone to heed his warning.

On August 19, 1692, Martha Carrier was executed by hanging at Gallows Hill in Salem Town. 

On September 7, 1692, another wave of accusations was made against Andover women, and Mary Marston, Hannah Tyler, Martha Tyler, Mary Bridges, and Mary's daughter (also named Mary Bridges) were taken for questioning. Two weeks later, dozens of Andover residents were jailed and pressured into confessing to witchcraft. As the hysteria spread and arrests continued, Andover soon had more accused witches than any other New England town. 
The elite of Andover were caught off guard. Captain Osgood, Deacon Frye, and other pillars of the church urged their friends and family members to confess, believing the message preached by Thomas Barnard that confession was the way to eternal life. And, “confess” they did, hoping that confession would keep them from being tried and executed. However, once numerous wives and children were in prison, the church pillars began to realize that they had been deceived by the fanaticism of their younger minister, Thomas Barnard. Finally comprehending the full implications of the hysteria, they turned to their older minister, Reverend Francis Dane, and formed a resistance movement. Under his guidance, they started to take the strong steps required to free the imprisoned members of their families. [source]
Salem Village and Andover are marked with red stars. Salem Town is outlined in red dots.

Francis Dane Attempts to Rein in the Madness

As dozens of Andover residents were accused and imprisoned following the touch tests, Francis Dane became increasingly outspoken. He circulated letters and petitions to colonial authorities questioning the evidence used in trials and protesting the imprisonment of so many respected citizens. His standing as Andover’s senior minister lent weight to these objections, though his own family’s involvement made his position precarious. He was accused of witchcraft himself while advocating for those who had been jailed, but was never arrested.

On September 22, 1692, Mary Parker of Andover was hanged in Salem, having been convicted of witchcraft. Dozens of other women languished in prison, some spared from the gallows only because they were pregnant, like Francis Dane's accused daughter, Abigail Faulkner. By October, as public confidence in the trials waned and leading ministers in Boston, including Cotton Mather, began to urge caution, Thomas Barnard started to pull back his support of the trials. Barnard, likely influenced by Dane’s steady opposition to the witch trials and the growing local outrage, joined his fellow minister in advocating mercy and moderation, acknowledging that the proceedings had gone too far. Together, Dane and Barnard helped organize petitions for the release of the accused Andover residents and worked to restore unity to their divided congregation.

On October 18, 1692, twenty-six men in Andover, including Francis Dane and Thomas Barnard, signed a letter written to Massachusetts Governor William Phips. In it, they claimed that the accusations had spiraled out of control and that good, God-fearing people had been arrested and were suffering in prison, causing extreme hardship to their families. They said that people had wrongly confessed out of fear and pressure from their terrified relatives. The letter-writers claimed that the accusers were under a diabolical influence, and that no one could think themselves safe in such an environment.
Now though we would not appear as Advocates for any who shall be found guilty of so horrid a crime, but we heartily desire that this place, and the whole land, may be purged from that great wickedness: yet if any of our freinds and neighbours have been misrepresented, as tis possible some of them have been; wee would crave leave (if it might be without offence) to speak something in their behalf, haveing no other desighn therein, then that the truth may appear. We can truly give this Testimony of the most of them belonging to this Town, that have been accused, that they never gave the least occasion (as we hear of) to their neerest relations or most intimate acquaintance, to suspect them of witchcraft. Severall of the women that are accused were members of this church in full Communion, and had obtained a good report, for their blameless conversation, and their walking as becometh woemen professing godliness. But whereas it may be alledged, that the most of our people that have been apprehended for witchcraft, have upon Examination confessed it. To which we Answer that we have nothing to plead for those that freely and upon conviction own themselves guilty; but we apprehend the case of some of them to be otherwise. for from the information we have had and the discourse some of us have had with the prisoners, we have reason to think that the extream urgency that was used with some of them by their friends and others who privately examined them, and the fear they were then under, hath been an inducement to them to own such things, as we cannott since find thay are conscious of; and the truth of what we now declare, we judge will in time more plainly appear. And some of them have exprest to their neighbours that it hath been their great trouble, that they have wronged themselves and the truth in their confessions.
...there are more of our neighb'rs of good reputation & approved integrity, who are still accused, and complaints have been made against them, And we know not who can think himself safe, if the Accusations of children and others who are under a Diabolicall influence shall be received against persons of good fame.
On October 29, 1692, after his own wife was accused of witchcraft, Governor Phips dissolved the special court of Oyer and Terminer, effectively ending new prosecutions. Dane’s outspoken criticism of the trials and the petitions of family members from Andover were among the voices that helped turn public sentiment. As new accusations and trials ceased, many convicted of witchcraft were still detained in Salem Town. Dane advocated for those in jail, pressing for their release and for the clearing of their names. He and Thomas Barnard both worked to rebuild the town’s moral fabric after months of terror and suspicion.

The Chandler-Bixby-Abbot house, home of Hannah Bixby, which still stands in Andover

The Chandlers in the Andover Witchcraft Trials

While there are no accounts detailing the experiences of Hannah Chandler Dane during the 1692 Andover witch trials, it is reasonable to assume that she experienced significant distress due to the widespread accusations affecting her family. Her husband, Francis Dane, was the most vocal critic of the hysteria in Andover, and both Chandler and Dane relatives were arrested and imprisoned. This tumultuous period must have caused extreme anxiety and emotional strain for Hannah.

Several other Chandler family members were impacted by the witchcraft scare in Andover. Two of William and Annis Chandler's grandsons (the sons of their son John Chandler) were accused. William and Annis were my 10th great-grandparents, and John was my 9th great-grandfather.

John Chandler, Jr. was accused of witchcraft in Andover and was questioned and imprisoned, but later released. His brother William, an innkeeper whose property lay on the Ipswich Road to Billerica, was also accused and briefly jailed.

William Chandler's daughter Phebe, who was eleven in 1692, was one of the accusers of Martha Carrier. In May 1692, she testified that she encountered Carrier’s threatening specter in the meeting house, and heard Carrier’s disembodied voice while running an errand for her mother. She claimed that she became ill after these events, and that Martha's witchcraft was the cause. 

Thomas Chandler, brother of William and John, Jr., testified against Andover fortune teller Samuel Wardwell in 1692 saying, “I have often heard Samuel Wardwell of Andover tell young persons their fortune and he was much addicted to it.” An accusation of fortune telling was enough to bring suspicion of witchcraft in the 1600s. Wardwell was executed in Salem on September 22, 1692. However, Thomas later had a change of heart and signed petitions in support of the accused.

Thomas Chandler's daughter Hannah, the wife of Daniel Bixby (sometimes spelled Bigsbee), testified that the specter of Mary Parker afflicted her. Thomas' granddaughter, ten year old Sarah Phelps, also accused Mary Parker, a widow with no previous complaints against her in Andover. The accusation of Mary Parker was so perplexing that Mary suggested in court that Hannah and Sarah must have meant another Mary Parker, for there was a second Mary Parker in Andover. However, when the touch test was administered, the afflicted girls cried out that this was the person cursing them, and Mary was convicted. She was later executed in Salem, on the same day as Samuel Wardwell.

The Salem Village Witchcraft Victims Memorial in Danvers, which lists the names of the victims from Andover. [Source: Danvers Library]

The Aftermath

In total, 45 people from Andover were accused of witchcraft in 1692, more than any other New England town. While Salem is the focus of historical accounts of this time period, because their hysteria started first and because the trials and executions largely took place in Salem Town, what happened in Andover was greater in scale and was unquestionably traumatic for all residents.

Some accounts question whether the citizens of Andover truly repented the conviction and execution of Martha Carrier. There seems to have been some sentiment that her arrest and death sentence were legitimate, but those that followed were regrettable hysteria. The change of heart about witchcraft accusations only began when well-liked people from prominent families were jailed, but Martha remained unpopular until the end.

Martha Carrier was officially exonerated when Massachusetts reversed her witchcraft conviction in 1711, and her family received financial restitution. The full exoneration of all victims took place in waves, with the court overturning some verdicts in 1702 and 1711 and additional official apologies and pardons coming much later. The last person to be exonerated was Elizabeth Johnson, the granddaughter of Francis Dane (daughter of Elizabeth Dane Johnson), whose conviction was officially overturned on May 26, 2022, 329 years after her arrest, thanks to the efforts of a middle school civics class.

Mary Parker's sons, John Parker and Joseph Parker, petitioned for restitution of her lands, which had been confiscated when Mary was executed. This request was granted, but Mary's conviction was not formally overturned until 1711. Like the Parkers, many families of those accused and killed worked to claim recompense for their losses. The trauma of their experiences would live with them the rest of their days.

As it became clear to officials, judges, and clergy the scope of the delusion of 1692, and how unjust it had all been, there was some effort to bury the official evidence of it. In Salem Witchcraft: With an Account of Salem Village and A History of Opinions on Witchcraft and Kindred Subjects, Charles W. Upham touches on a cover-up.
The effect produced upon the public mind, when it became convinced that the proceedings had been wrong, and innocent blood shed, was a universal disposition to bury the recollection of the whole transaction in silence, and, if possible, oblivion. This led to a suppression and destruction of the ordinary materials of history. Papers were abstracted from the files, documents in private hands were committed to the flames, and a chasm left in the records of churches and public bodies. The journal of the Special Court of Oyer and Terminer is nowhere to be found.
In early 1693, Francis Dane wrote a letter lamenting the Andover witchcraft hysteria by stating, "Had charity been put on, the devil would not have had such an advantage against us," and acknowledging the role of spectral evidence in influencing trials and the unjust imprisonment of many innocent people, including his own family. He argued that a focus on grace and not solely on the accusations from afflicted individuals would have prevented the panic, and he believed the accusations themselves were a tool of the devil.
...had Charity been put on, the Divel would not have had such an advantage against us, and I beleeve many Innocent persons have been accused, & Imprisoned, the Conceit of Spectre Evidence as an infallible mark did too far prevaile with us Hence we so easily parted with our neighbours of honest, & good report, & members in full Communion, hence we so easily parted with our Children, when we knew nothing in their lives, nor any of our neighbours to suspect them and thus things were hurried on, hence such strange breaches in families. [Francis Dane, 1693]
In Salem Witchcraft: With an Account of Salem Village and A History of Opinions on Witchcraft and Kindred Subjects, Charles W. Upham writes of Francis Dane, "He deserves to be recognized as standing pre-eminent, and, for a time, almost alone, in bold denunciation and courageous resistance of the execrable proceedings of that dark day."

Monday, October 20, 2025

The Chandler and Brown Families in Colonial America



In the last several years, I've been especially interested in the lines of my family that intertwine in New England in the early-to-mid 1600s. On a recent trip to Boston, I visited American Ancestors (formerly The New England Historic Genealogical Society) and was able to spend a rainy afternoon in the stacks researching some of these families. In particular, I've been wanting to learn more about my Chandler ancestors, who are on my Dickson/Bellangee line, and married into the Brown family.

Immigrant Ancestors: William Chandler and Annis Bayford

My 10th great-grandparents, William Chandler and Annis Bayford, were from Bishop’s Stortford in Hertfordshire, England, a market town that served as a major coach stop between London and Cambridge/Newmarket. The primary industry in Bishop's Stortford in the early 1600s was malting, the process of steeping, germinating, and drying grain to convert it into malt for use in brewing and distilling.

A contemporary view of Bishop's Stortford, England [source: Bishop's Stortford Town Council]
 
William was the eldest son of Henry Chandler, a glover, and his wife (Anne or Agnes), and was baptized at Bishop's Stortford on October 12, 1595. On January 29, 1622, William married Alice Thorogood. They had two daughters together, Elizabeth (1622-1636) and Sarah (1624-1626). 

Alice died in June 1625 and William married Annis Bayford later that year, on November 6, 1625. Annis was the daughter of Francis Bayford and his wife Johan. At the time of the wedding, William was the father of two young girls from his first marriage. Sadly, young Sarah died at about age two, just a year after his marriage to Annis. William and Annis had seven children together, six of them in Bishop's Stortford before they departed for Massachusetts. Only their youngest, also named Sarah, was born in the American colonies. 
  1. William Chandler, b. 1626, d. 1633
  2. Thomas Chandler, b. 1628, d. 1703, m. Hannah Brewer
  3. Hannah Chandler, b. 1629, d. 1711, m. (1) George Abbot (2) Francis Dane 
  4. Henry Chandler, b. 1632, d. young
  5. John Chandler, b. 1634, d. 1703, m. Elizabeth Douglas
  6. William Chandler, b. 1635, d. 1678, m. (1) Mary Dane (2) Bridget Henchman
  7. Sarah Chandler, b. 1638, d. aft. 1713, m. (1) William Cleaves (2) (first name unknown)Wilson (3) Ephraim Stevens (4) (first name unknown) Allen 
William's eldest child, Elizabeth, died in 1636, and two of his children with Annis, William and Henry, also died young. When the Chandler family left England, the children who sailed with them were Thomas, Hannah, John, and William (this was a second William named for his late brother).

The red pin marks the location of Bishop's Stortford in England

The Chandlers in Roxbury

William and Annis Chandler were Puritans who were associated with Reverend John Eliot, a minister from the neighboring parish of Widford. Eliot left England for Roxbury, Massachusetts in 1631 and later became known as the “Apostle to the Indians” for his dedication to converting Native American tribes to Christianity. In modern times these efforts are regarded through a less complimentary lens, but in his own time, Eliot was widely revered for the sixty years he ministered at Roxbury and his interactions with local tribes.
For over 60 years Eliot served the [Roxbury] congregation faithfully and during that time became one of New England's most respected ministers. His duties in Roxbury brought Eliot into close contact with the Native Americans in the area, and he decided in the early 1640s to attempt to convert them to Christianity. Before this undertaking could begin, however, Eliot had to master the Algonquian language. In the absence of phonetic guides and printed vocabularies, this was no easy task. Undeterred, he studied the language diligently for several years under the tutelage of Cochenoe, a Long Island native whom the Puritans had taken captive during the Pequot War of 1637. By 1646 Eliot became sufficiently fluent to begin proselytizing.

Eliot preached to the native tribes for the first time at Nonantum (later Newton), Massachusetts on October 28, 1646. Although he began with a prayer in English, he conducted the major portion of the three-hour service in his listeners' own language. This initial effort was a great success, and within a short time Eliot had converted a number of natives. In addition to preaching and attracting missionaries and funds for future proselytizing efforts, Eliot sought to convert more natives by making Christianity available to them in printed form. In 1654 he published a catechism that served both to summarize Christian religious beliefs and to familiarize the native peoples with his written version of their language. In 1650 he began a translation of the Bible into an Algonquian language. Published in 1663, Eliot's Indian Bible was the first Bible printed in North America. [Source]
In 1637, William and Annis left England with their children and followed Rev. Eliot to Roxbury, where William’s name appears in a record titled “ye Estates and persons of ye inhabitants of Roxbury,” compiled between 1638 and 1640. This inventory notes that he owned 22 acres located near what are now Bartlett and Washington Streets in modern Roxbury. 

In Roxbury records, William’s trade was listed as “point maker," a craftsman producing metal tips for laces that were used to fasten garments before the widespread use of buttons. These were also known as "aglets." 

This is an example of the points, or aglets, produced in William Chandler's time.

William Chandler died on January 26, 1642 of consumption (now called tuberculosis), after a prolonged illness of nearly a year. His widow, Annis Bayford Chandler, remarried twice, first to John Dane on July 2, 1643. 

When he married Annis, John Dane was about 53 and a widower who had already raised four children. Annis was 40 with five children still living at home. In looking at the historical records, it's not clear if this marriage was a great deal for John Dane, as William Chandler apparently left behind a financial mess when he died. In 1649, Dane petitioned the court in Roxbury to settle Chandler’s estate upon him, noting he had “paid more debts of Chandler than ye house and land was worth, and also brought up ye children of Chandler.” John Dane died in 1658, at the age of 71. The Chandler and Dane families remained close. In 1658, Annis' son William Chandler married John Dane's granddaughter, Mary Dane. At the age of 75, having been twice widowed, John Dane's son Francis Dane married Annis Chandler's daughter Hannah, who was then a widow of 60. These Chandler and Dane families settled primarily in Andover, Massachusetts, and were embroiled in the witch trials there in 1692. This will be the subject of a future post.

After the death of John Dane, Annis Bayford Chandler married for a third time, to John Paraminter, on August 9, 1660. Annis was 57 and John was 72. He died in 1671 at the age of 83. Annis lived another twelve years, dying in Roxbury on March 15, 1683, at the age of 80.

The Next Generation: John Chandler and Elizabeth Douglas

William and Annis' fifth child, John Chandler, was my 9th great-grandfather. John was baptized on July 27, 1634 at St. Michael's Church in Bishop's Stortford. He was only seven years old at the time of his father’s death and was then raised by his stepfather, John Dane. 

St. Michael's Church was originally built in the early 1400s, on the site of a 7th century church. It looks much the same today as it would have when John Chandler was baptized in 1634. 

On February 16, 1658, John married Elizabeth Douglas, the daughter of William Douglas and Anne Mattle. William Douglas was born in 1610 in Scotland and Anne was born the same year in Ringstead, Northamptonshire, England. The Douglases settled in Northamptonshire and had three children there before immigrating to Massachusetts in 1640. They lived first on Cape Ann, where Elizabeth was born in 1641, before settling in Boston. William worked as a cooper (barrel maker) and was a member of the First Church of Boston. When he died on July 27, 1682, at age 72, Rev. Simon Bradstreet, the son of Governor Simon Bradstreet and the poet Anne Bradstreet, wrote that Douglas had been “an able Christian, and this poor church will much want him.” 

Elizabeth was sixteen when she married John Chandler in 1658. He was twenty-four. They settled in Roxbury, on a lot adjacent to John’s mother, Annis.

John and Elizabeth Chandler had eight children together:
  1. John Chandler, b. 1659; d. 1659
  2. Elizabeth Chandler, b. 1661; d. 1688; m. Robert Mason
  3. John Chandler, b. 1665; d. 1743; m. Mary Raymond
  4. Joseph Chandler, b. 1667; d. 1668
  5. Hannah Chandler, b. 1669; d. 1692; m. Moses Draper
  6. Mehetabel Chandler, b. 1673; d. 1758; m. John Coit
  7. Sarah Chandler, b. 1676; d. 1711; m. (1) William Coit, (2) John Gardner
  8. Joseph Chandler, b. 1683; d. 1749; m. Susanna Perrin
Their first child, John, lived only nine months. Around this same time, Elizabeth’s parents and most of her siblings, except her sister Anna, moved from Massachusetts to the growing settlement of New London, Connecticut. Today, Roxbury and New London are two hours apart by car, but it would have been a much longer and more difficult journey in the 1600s. Elizabeth likely did not see her parents and siblings often after this time.

Elizabeth Douglas Chandler was literate and well educated. During her life, she wrote extensively, including a 64-page autobiography entitled "Meditation, or Poem, being an Epic of the Experiences and Conflicts of a Poor Trembling Soul in the First Fourty Years of Her Life." This document survives in the archives of the Yale University Library.


In 1686, John Chandler and his eldest son, John Jr., decided to relocate the family from its longtime home in Roxbury. They were among the first settlers of New Roxbury, which was later renamed Woodstock and became part of Connecticut. They received Lot No. 10 in the first division of land. In 1688, two years after their arrival in Woodstock, Elizabeth moved the younger children from Roxbury to join them. Woodstock was still an hour away from her siblings in New London, but much closer than she had been in Roxbury.

John Chandler died in Woodstock on April 15, 1703. He is buried at Woodstock Hill Cemetery.

After John's death, in 1704, Elizabeth went to live with her daughter Mehetabel Chandler Coit in New London. She also had siblings and many nieces and nephews nearby. Elizabeth died in 1705 and is buried in the old cemetery in New London.

The Chandlers in Connecticut

John and Elizabeth’s youngest child, Joseph Chandler, born June 4, 1683, was my 8th great-grandfather. He was born in Roxbury, before the family moved to Woodstock.

On June 22, 1708, Joseph married Susanna Perrin, the daughter of John Perrin and Mary Polley. Susanna was named for her grandmother, Susanna Bacon Polley, who had immigrated from England aboard the ship Increase in 1635. Her father, John Perrin, had originally lived in Braintree, but at some point moved the family to Roxbury, where the Perrins likely met the Chandlers. After their marriage, Susanna and Joseph settled in Pomfret, Connecticut, just a few miles south of Joseph's family's home in Woodstock.

The Thomas Goodell Homestead/ James Ingalls Tavern in Pomfret was built in 1707, just a year before Joseph and Susanna were married and settled in Pomfret. It shows the style of colonial home that was typical at that time.

Joseph Chandler was made a selectman in Pomfret in 1716 and was admitted to the church on April 20, 1719. That same year, he served on the Committee for the Division of Land in Pomfret. City records from 1726 note that he was a collector of taxes. 

Joseph and Susanna had twelve children, all born in Pomfret:
  1. Joseph Chandler, b. 1709; d. 1709
  2. Joseph Chandler, b. 1710; d. 1780; m. Elizabeth Sumner
  3. David Chandler, b. 1712; d. 1796; m. Mary Allen.
  4. Susanna Chandler, b. 1713; d. 1801; m. William Sabin
  5. Peter Chandler, b. 1716; d. 1733
  6. Dorothy Chandler, b. 1718; d. 1773; m. (1) John Mason, (2) Jonathan Curtis
  7. Hebzibah Chandler, b. 1720; d. 1810; m. (1) Bryant Brown
  8. Stephen Chandler, b. 1722; d. 1752
  9. Josiah Chandler, b. 1724; d. 1798; m. (1) Freelove Carpenter, (2) Lydia Richardson, (3) Mary Blanchard
  10. Eunice Chandler, b. 1726; d. 1769; m. Josiah Burlingame
  11. Daniel Chandler, b. 1729; d. 1790; m. Violet Burnham
  12. Peter Chandler, b. 1733; d. 1816; m. (1) Mary Hodges, (2) Abigail Wales
Joseph died on January 5, 1749 at the age of 65. Susannah died on January 22, 1755 at the age of 75.

The Brown Family and the American Revolution

Joseph and Susanna’s daughter Hepzibah Chandler was born in Pomfret, Connecticut on August 12, 1720. In 1742, she married Bryant Brown, the son of Nathaniel Brown and Deborah Bryant of Killingly, Connecticut. The Browns descended from John Brown of Reading, Massachusetts, who was the family's immigrant ancestor. Hepzibah and Bryant lived for a short time in Ashford, Connecticut, but in 1745 moved to Thompson, Connecticut and settled on a farm given to Bryant by his grandfather. At that time, Thompson was a parish within the town of Killingly, Connecticut, and in 1785 became an independent town.

Hepzibah and Bryant Brown had eleven children together:
  1. Jesse Brown, b. 1741; d. 1818; m. Experience Hughes
  2. Mary Brown, b. 1743; d. 1772
  3. Bryant Brown, b. 1745; d. 1798; m. Mary Dunbar
  4. Deborah Brown, b. 1747; d. 1831; m. Eliakim Robinson
  5. Joseph Brown, b. 1749; d. 1810; m. Elizabeth Gary
  6. Peter Brown, b. 1751; d. 1756
  7. Chloe Brown, b. 1753; d. 1756
  8. Solomon Brown, b. 1755; d. young
  9. Peter Brown, b. 1757; d. 1759
  10. Chloe Brown, b. 1759; d. 1814; m. Solomon Wakefield
  11. Solomon Brown, b. 1761; d. 1850; m. Betty Wheston
The gravestone of three of the Brown children who died young, located in the West Thompson Cemetery in Thompson, Connecticut. Inscription:
Brown, Peter son of Brant & Hepsibah died Sept 11, 1756 age 5years 5mos
Brown, Peter son of Brant & Hepsibah died Set 15, 1759 age 2years 4 mos
Brown, Chloe daughter of Brant & Hepsibah died Sept 14, 1756 age 3 years

Throughout the 1760s and 1770s, as Bryant and Hepzibah entered middle age, tensions between the American colonies and England steadily escalated. Protests over new taxes such as the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Acts of 1767 gave way to open conflict by the mid-1770s, marked by events like the Boston Tea Party (1773) and the first shots of the Revolutionary War at Lexington and Concord (1775). In 1774, Bryant served as a member of a Killingly committee that sent relief to Boston during during the British blockade.
The Boston Port Act, passed in March 1774 closed the Port from all commerce and ordered the citizens of Boston to pay a large fine to compensate for the tea thrown into the river during the Boston Tea Party. This Act helped unify the Thirteen Colonies in anger against the Crown, and the First Continental Congress met to coordinate a response to this and the other Intolerable Acts. [source: American Battlefield Trust]
As revolution loomed, Bryant was too old to take up arms, but his sons were at the right age to enlist in the fight. While I have not been able to determine if Bryant and Hepzibah's eldest son, Jesse Brown, and their youngest son, Solomon Brown, fought during the Revolutionary War, two of their sons, Bryant Jr. and Joseph, definitely did.

Bryant Brown, Jr. served as a sergeant in the response to the Lexington Alarm in April 1775. This was the first battle of the Revolutionary War, preceded by Paul Revere's famous ride to spread the alarm, and the moment of "the shot heard round the world" on Concord's North Bridge. Immediately following this incident, groups of volunteers were organized in Connecticut to go north to support American efforts in Massachusetts. Following the Lexington Alarm, Bryant served as a sergeant in the 3rd Connecticut Regiment from May 10 - December 16, 1775. This regiment was reorganized, and for the entirety of 1776, Bryant was an ensign in the 20th Continental Regiment under Colonel John Durkee. The 20th Regiment, and presumably that included Bryant, was at Fort Lee when the Americans were defeated by the British under the command of Lt. Gen. Cornwallis (as directed by Gen. William Howe, my husband's 3rd cousin, 9x removed). From January 1, 1777 to April 11, 1777, Bryant was a second lieutenant in the 8th Connecticut Regiment under Col. John Chandler. Col. John Chandler was Bryant's cousin, the son of his mother Hepzibah's brother Joseph Chandler. Bryant resigned from service on April 11, 1777, having served for two years in pursuit of American independence.

A painting entitled North Bridge, Concord, 1775, painted in 1909 by Frank T. Merrill

Joseph Brown, my 6th great-grandfather, also responded to the Lexington Alarm, in a group organized by John Elwell. It's quite likely that he and his brother Bryant headed to Connecticut in the same group of volunteers. At this time, Joseph was recently married to Elizabeth Gary, the daughter of Josiah Gary and Sarah Sprague of Pomfret, Connecticut. The wedding ceremony was performed on March 3, 1774, by Rev. Putnam, likely of the local Congregational Church. Joseph and Elizabeth's first child, Joseph Jr., was born in January 1775, just months before Joseph began his military service.

In May 1775, Joseph enlisted in the 3rd Connecticut Regiment, like his brother, where he served from May 1775 to November 1775. The 3rd saw action at the Battle of Bunker Hill during the Siege of Boston. While this battle ended in American defeat, the British lost more soldiers than they anticipated and were sobered by the fierce fighting from the lesser-equipped Americans. 
...the Connecticut 3rd... served with such distinction and brilliance at Bunker Hill and during the succeeding campaign. A large part of this Regiment was retained as guard at headquarters during the Bunker Hill Battle, but a detachment of Killingly men struck in at the last and helped cover Prescott's retreat. [source]
I don't know for certain where Joseph served between November 1775 and October 1777, but the fact that his second child, Randolph Brown, was born in April 1777 indicates that Joseph spent at least part of 1776 at home with his wife, Elizabeth. By October 1777, he had returned to the American forces, and that month he fought in the Battle of Germantown, an American defeat near Philadelphia, under the command of George Washington. Having survived this battle, Joseph was assigned to the brigade led by Brigadier General Jedidiah Huntington, composed largely of men from Connecticut. After the Battle of Germantown, Huntington's brigade joined Gen. George Washington's army at Towamensing, Pennsylvania, around October 11th and then moved with the army to the Valley Forge area for the winter encampment. Huntington's men helped construct earthworks to defend the encampment. The winter encampment at Valley Forge is, of course, a legendary moment in the Revolutionary War, and it's incredible that my 6th great-grandfather was there with George Washington during those months of cold, hunger, and suffering. Following Valley Forge, Joseph was assigned to the 5th Regiment in the Connecticut Line, part of the Continental Army. He served through 1779.

"The March to Valley Forge" by William Trego, 1883

Once Joseph was home, he and Elizabeth had seven more children together. Sadly, their first three children died in infancy, but the latter seven survived to adulthood.
  1. Joseph Brown, b. 1775; d. 1775
  2. Randolph Brown, b. 1777; d. 1777
  3. Randolph Brown, b. 1779; d. 1779
  4. William Brown, b. 1780; d. 1868; m. (1) Bridget Palmer (2) Sarah Loomis
  5. Bryant Brown, b. 1782; d. 1814
  6. Joseph Brown, b. 1784; d. 1877; m. Abigail Morse
  7. Abigail Brown, b. 1786; d. 1849; m. Benjamin Seamans
  8. Elizabeth Brown, b. 1788; d. 1868; m. (first name unknown) Manchester
  9. George Brown, b. 1792; d. 1823
  10. Samuel Brown, b. 1794; d. 1822
This brings us to my fifth great-grandfather, William Brown, and then my fourth great-grandmother, William's daughter Amelia Brown, both of whom I've written about before on this blog.

The Legacy of the Chandler and Brown Families

Like many early colonial families, William Chandler and Annis Bayford founded a lineage that extends across centuries of American history. The Chandlers helped build the towns and institutions of early New England, and their descendants went on to shape communities and industries throughout the nation. Among their many descendants are several notable Americans:
  • U.S. President Rutherford B. Hayes - The 19th President of the United States, Rutherford B. Hayes descends from William and Annis Chandler's son Thomas Chandler and his wife Hannah Brewer. William and Annis were his 5th great-grandparents. Rutherford B. Hayes is my 5th cousin, 6 times removed.
  • Zachariah Chandler - Zachariah Chandler was a four-term U.S. Senator from Michigan and served as the Secretary of the Interior under President Ulysses S. Grant. He was also a noted abolitionist. He descends from William and Annis Chandler's son William Chandler, Jr. and his wife Mary Dane. William and Annis were his 5th great-grandparents. Zachariah Chandler is my 5th cousin, 6 times removed.
  • John Chandler - John Chandler was a state senator and a U.S. Congressman from Massachusetts. He descends from William and Annis Chandler's son Thomas Chandler and his wife Hannah Brewer. John fought in the Revolutionary War as a teenager, and then served in the War of 1812 as a Brigadier General. After the war, he moved to Maine, where he was elected a U.S. Senator from that state. William and Annis were his 4th great-grandparents. John Chandler is my 4th cousin, 7 times removed.
  • Seth Carlo Chandler, Jr. - Seth Carlo Chandler, Jr. was an astronomer famed for his discovery of the Chandler Wobble, an off-center motion exhibited by Earth as it rotates on its axis. There is a crater on the moon named after him. Like me, Seth Carlo Chandler, Jr. was descended from William and Annis Chandler's son John Chandler and his wife Elizabeth Douglas, and their son Joseph Chandler and his wife Susanna Perrin. William and Annis were his 5th great-grandparents. Seth Carlo Chandler, Jr. is my 4th cousin, 5 times removed.
  • Harry Chandler, Norman Chandler, and Otis Chandler - Three generations of Chandlers owned the Los Angeles Times between 1917-1985 and their surname is well known in Los Angeles. Norman Chandler's wife, Dorothy Buffum Chandler, was a notable arts patron in Los Angeles, and the Dorothy Chandler Pavillion, one of the largest performing arts centers in America, was named in her honor. Like me, Harry, Norman, and Otis Chandler descended from William and Annis Chandler's son John Chandler and his wife Elizabeth Douglas, and their son Joseph Chandler and his wife Susanna Perrin. William and Annis were Harry's 6th great-grandparents. Harry is my 5th cousin, 4 times removed. Norman is my 6th cousin, 3 times removed. Otis Chandler is my 7th cousin, 2 times removed.
While I don't know of any famous descendants from the Brown line, when I think of this family, I think of their dedication to their country and community. Joseph Brown, my 6th great-grandfather, served in the Revolutionary War alongside his brother Bryant, and endured one of the most famed hardships of that war, the winter camp at Valley Forge. Joseph's son, William Brown, my 5th great-grandfather, was the town doctor in Mendon, New York, and he provided care to his neighbors during a long and devoted medical career. The way they each served their communities makes me very proud to be their descendant.

The many branches of this particular tree are fascinating, and next up, I'll share details about the Chandler family in Andover, Massachusetts during the 1692 witch trials.

Saturday, August 30, 2025

Finding My Second Great-Grandparents: The Kilcullen Family of Sligo, Ireland

Sligo, Ireland

In 2023, I wrote this post about my paternal great-grandmother Sarah Kilcullen, who emigrated from Sligo, Ireland to San Francisco in the early 1900s. Over the years, I'd explored many avenues to try to learn more about Sarah, but hadn't been able to come up with much new information. Her parents were still unknown, as was her place of birth in County Sligo. 

In advance of a trip to Ireland with my family this summer, I dug into my Kilcullen notes again to see if I could make any progress on this mystery. I also searched family history resources in Sligo and found the County Sligo Heritage & Genealogy Centre. Since my upcoming travels included a stop in Sligo, I wondered if I might be able to visit the centre and look at local records, so I sent off an email query. 

Everyone encounters brick walls in their family history research. It can be frustrating and disheartening. It's easy to resign yourself to the idea that some mysteries just can't be solved. However, as I've learned many times in my genealogy work, you've got to keep trying, because the answers are out there. When you are stuck, seek assistance. I wrote the County Sligo Heritage & Genealogy Centre asking for help, and boy did I get it. I'd like to say a huge thank you to Theresa and Lorraine, who received my message two months before I planned to arrive in Sligo, and were immediately responsive. They emailed back and forth with me, they started researching, and then Lorraine met me in Sligo and delivered a treasure trove of information and a handwritten family tree. To say I'm grateful is an understatement, and I'm also deeply appreciative of how quickly they worked. They really went above and beyond for me.


When I first got in contact with Lorraine and Theresa, they recommended I revisit my previous research to see if there were any gaps. In particular, they asked if I had contacted the San Francisco church where Sarah Kilcullen married Thomas Lacey in 1908. There is a marriage license visible online which lists their names and the date, but Lorraine and Theresa reminded me that the church might have more information. Well, of course I'd reached out to the church. Hadn't I? This is a great reminder that a solid research checklist is critical. If I'd created one for Sarah, I might have realized this oversight in my research sooner. It turns out that I had not actually made contact with the church.

I found an email for St. Teresa of Avila in San Francisco and sent them a message. Honestly, I expected nothing. Sarah and Thomas were married in 1908, two years after the great San Francisco earthquake and fire devastated the city, burning over 80% of San Francisco. Would records have been kept as the city struggled to rebuild? If so, would the church still have them 117 years later? The church was moved in 1924 and partially destroyed by fire in 1932, making me skeptical that marriage records would have survived. If they did, would anyone at the church have time to go searching through the old books? Despite the odds, just two days later, I received an email from the church with a scanned image of my great-grandparents' marriage record.


This record was full of information I already knew, including the date of the marriage and the names of Thomas Lacey's parents. It also shows that Sarah's younger sister Annie was a witness to the marriage. There was no doubt that this was my great-grandparents. It also clearly lists the names of Sarah's parents, information my family has been trying to find for many, many years. Thank you, St. Teresa of Avila for keeping and sharing your records! Thanks to them, I finally learned that Sarah's parents were Dominic Kilcullen and Catherine Kerins. I had never heard either of these names before. In all the research I'd done on Kilcullen families in Sligo, they had never appeared as a possibility. I passed along the names to the County Sligo Heritage & Genealogy Centre and hoped they might be able to provide more information about the family.

Entering my busiest work moment of the year, I didn't have time to meaningfully research my newly-discovered second great-grandparents, so I showed up in Sligo in June hopeful that Lorraine and Teresa had been able to uncover more details. I can't really say enough about how lovely they were, and how deeply I appreciate all Lorraine's research and time. She put together a whole family tree, including Sarah's parents, grandparents, and siblings. She researched each sibling in detail, provided information about where the family lived and Dominic's occupation. She answered all my questions and gave me suggestions on what to search for next. It was such a fantastic experience, and I highly encourage anyone researching County Sligo ancestors to contact the County Sligo Heritage & Genealogy Centre. Below, in a nutshell, is what I learned from Lorraine.

The Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception, Sligo

The Kilcullen Family in Sligo

Sarah Kilcullen's parents were married on November 30, 1858 at The Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception, the largest Catholic church in Sligo. Their marriage register lists them as Dominic Kilcullen of Knocknaganny and Catherine Keirnes of Old Pound Street. Catherine's surname, Kerins, is sometimes found with different spellings, but it is a popular surname in County Sligo, and it is traditionally spelled Kerins, so that's what I'll use here. The marriage registration also lists Dominic and Catherine's parents: Dominic Kilcullen and Alice Dunleavy, and Patrick Keirnes and Winifred Mulrooney.

In my last post about Sarah Kilcullen and her sister Annie, I mentioned that when Annie arrived at Ellis Island on October 10, 1907, she recorded her most recent address as Pound Street, Sligo, and her closest relative as Mrs. James Mulrooney, a cousin. This makes so much sense since learning that her grandmother's maiden name was Mulrooney and the Kerins family lived on Old Pound Street.

The location of Old Pound Street, just south of Sligo's city center

The area where the Kilcullen and Kerins families lived is just south of Sligo's city center. The area is called Knocknaganny, and Old Pound Street is located between R287 and Gallows Hill Road. When my family drove into Sligo this summer, we drove right through this neighborhood, not knowing yet that it was the Kilcullen family home. Now, it is filled with dense housing, just a three minute drive from the Garvoge River, flowing through Sligo's city center. Lorraine told me that when the Kilcullens lived there, it would have been farmland. 

Dominic Kilcullen is listed as a farmer on the baptismal records of his children, but Lorraine told me that at some point he transitioned to selling cattle. She also thought it possible that the Kilcullens may have originally come from Easky, a village located about 26 miles west of Sligo, right on the Atlantic Coast. There is a large concentration of people with the Kilcullen surname there. However, by the time Sarah was born, her family had been settled in the city of Sligo for some time.

A more detailed look at the neighborhood

The Children of Dominic Kilcullen and Catherine Kerins


Lorraine believes that Dominic and Catherine had twelve children:
  1. M (perhaps Mary?) Kilcullen (b. 1859-1860)
  2. John Kilcullen (b. 1861)
  3. Bridget Kilcullen (b. 1863)
  4. Dominic Kilcullen (b. 1865)
  5. Thomas Kilcullen (b. 1867)
  6. Catherine Kilcullen (b. 1869)
  7. John Kilcullen (b. 1871)
  8. Francis Kilcullen (b. 1873)
  9. James Kilcullen (b. 1876)
  10. Sarah Kilcullen (b. 1878)
  11. Patrick Kilcullen (b. 1881)
  12. Annie Kilcullen (b. 1883)
The first child for whom there are birth/baptismal records is John Kilcullen in 1861. However, Dominic and Catherine were married in 1858, and it would be extremely unusual to not have a child for three years after a marriage. Additionally, Dominic's death record was signed by a M. Kilcullen, stated to be his daughter. Lorraine proposed that M. Kilcullen was a first child whose records have not survived, and that her name was likely Mary, given naming patterns amongst Catholic residents in Sligo.

The second child, John, was born in 1861, but given that another John was born in 1871, it is almost certain that this first John died before that time, and the second John was named in his memory. Given that there were two other boys born after the first John, it sees likely that John died sometime between Thomas' birth in 1867 and the second John's birth in 1871, between the ages of 6-10. John's godparents are listed on his baptismal record as Michael Kearns and Margaret Kilcullen. This might be a brother of his mother, Catherine, and a sister of his father, Dominic.

Bridget, the third child, was born in 1862 and her godparents are recorded as Eugene Kilcullen and Anna Kilcullen. They may have been siblings or cousins of her father, Dominic. There are no further records for Bridget in Ireland, either marriage or death, and she does not appear in the Irish Census of 1901. Lorraine thinks this indicates that she either married and was never recorded with the name Kilcullen again, or she emigrated to the UK or America.

Dominic was born in 1865 and his godparents were listed as Eugene Kilcullen and Maria Kearns. On his civil birth entry, his father, Dominic Kilcullen Sr., listed the family's home as Marymount, Sligo. Marymount is a street in Knocknaganny, tucked right between Circular Road and R287, and around the corner from Old Pound Street. There are no further records for Dominic, Jr. in Sligo, and he does not appear in the 1901 census. Lorraine thought it was likely that he had emigrated, and I agree, because there are records for a Dominic Kilcullen in both Los Angeles and San Francisco in the early 1900s that I believe place him in America with some of his siblings.

Thomas Kilcullen was born in 1867. His godparents were Eugene Kilcullen and Sarah Kerins. Thomas's civil birth entry was registered by his father with an address of Cornageeha, which was part of Knocknaganny. Unfortunately, Lorraine located a death entry for a Thomas Kilcullen from Knocknaganny who died on March 17, 1891 (St. Patrick's Day) in the Sligo infirmary from Bright's disease. If this is our Thomas, he would have been 24 years old at the time of his death. He was unmarried and working as a laborer.
Bright’s disease is an archaic term for what is now referred to as ‘nephritis’. Nephritis is an inflammation of the kidneys, caused by toxins, infection or autoimmune conditions. It is not strictly a single disease, rather a condition with a number of types and causes. In glomerulonephritis, the most common type of nephritis, the infection affects the renal basin. In interstitial nephritis, the inflammation affects the space between the renal tubes. There are three main causes of nephritis, each with their own nomenclature. ‘Pyelonephritis’ is kidney inflammation that can develop when an untreated urinary tract infection spreads to the kidneys. ‘Lupus nephritis’ is caused by an autoimmune response during a lupus flare. Nephritis can also be caused by strain and injury to the kidneys during exercise, known as ‘athletic nephritis’. [Source: University of Leeds]

Catherine Kilcullen was born in 1869. Her godparents were Thomas Kilcullen and Eleonora (Ellen) Kerins. Like her sister Bridget, there are no further records for Catherine in Ireland, meaning she likely either married or emigrated. The time period when Catherine was a young woman was a time of frequent emigration by young Irish people, looking abroad for better work opportunities. Lorraine thinks it likely that most of the Kilcullen children left Ireland in their late teens and early twenties.

John Kilcullen (the second) was born in 1871. Lorraine was able to find his civil birth registration but not a baptismal record, so we don't know who his godparents were. We are certain that John emigrated to America in 1898, as Lorraine found him on a passenger list arriving in New York. I'll share more details about the post-emigration lives of the Kilcullen children later.

Francis Kilcullen was born in 1873, and his godparents were John Kilcullen and Maria Kilcullen. This is not completely confirmed, but it looks possible that at the age of 19, Francis joined the military. There is a Francis Kilcullen listed in Militia Attestation Papers who enlisted in the Sligo Royal Garrison Artillery as a gunner in 1896. Lorraine provided me with information about the military presence in Sligo and encouraged me to look at army records to confirm that this is the correct Francis Kilcullen. I'll be doing that soon.

James Kilcullen was born in 1876. His godparents were John Kilcullen and Maria Kilcullen. James can be found in the 1901 census living in Cornageeha with his mother and his younger brother, Patrick. He is listed as a farm laborer. It's unclear what happened to James after 1901. There is a James Kilcullen in the 1911 Irish census, living in a Sligo boarding house and working as a mason, but it's not certain that this is the same James.

Sarah Kilcullen, my great-grandmother, was most likely the next Kilcullen child, born in 1878. As noted in my previous post about Sarah, I have several different birth dates for her, ranging from 1883-1885. Her gravestone says 1883, a full five years after this Kilcullen child was born. Making this more complicated is the fact that the priest neglected to record the name of the female Kilcullen child baptized in Sligo on March 31, 1878. Civil records for this birth cannot be located, either. However, the two children born after this are clearly recorded, so this is really the only child that could be Sarah. Lorraine explained that while birth dates were noted accurately in baptismal records, ages often jump around in other records. For instance, Sarah's mother Catherine is listed as being age 50 in the 1901 Census. However, her baptismal record notes that she was born on January 13, 1841, which means she was actually 60 in 1901. Lorraine said that when the 1908 Old Age Pension was introduced, some people's ages jumped twenty years in the records, to ensure they'd qualify for the pension early. So, other than the initial baptismal record, ages and dates of birth can be taken with a grain of salt.

Patrick Kilcullen was born in 1881. His godparents were Dominic Kilcullen and Bridget Kilcullen. Patrick can be found in the 1901 census living in Cornageeha with his mother and his older brother James. Unfortunately, seven years later, Patrick died at the age of 27. His death record was registered by his brother James, so James was still living in Cornageeha in 1908. On the death record, Patrick is listed as a laborer. It says his cause of death is bronchitis and throwing up of blood, and indicates that he had been suffering from this condition for two years.

Annie Kilcullen was the last of the Kilcullen children, born in 1883. Her given name appears to have been Anne Maria. Like her sister Sarah, Annie's birth date varies wildly in records after her baptism. Immigration records indicate a birth anywhere from 1887-1889. It appears that Annie may have emigrated to America in her late teens, returned to Ireland, perhaps to care for her ailing mother, and then left for America permanently after that time. I'll provide more detail on this in an upcoming post about the Kilcullen children in America.

The Deaths of Dominic Kilcullen and Catherine Kerins

Dominic Kilcullen died on December 15, 1890, at the age of 66. The cause of death was Hemiplegia, which can mean many things, but likely refers to a stroke. His death record was signed by M. Kilcullen, his daughter, who resided on Circular Road. This road is adjacent to Old Pound Street. My great-grandmother Sarah would have been about 12 years old when her father died. Her sister Annie, the youngest Kilcullen sibling, would have been just 7 years of age.

Catherine Kerins Kilcullen died on March 30, 1907, at the age of 66. The cause of death was Influenza. Her death was registered by Annie Kilcullen, Sarah's younger sister. 

Lorraine believes that Dominic and Catherine would have been buried in Sligo Cemetery, just a 10 minute walk from Old Pound Street, but that their graves are likely unmarked.

Sligo Cemetery

The Kilcullen Children in America

A number of the Kilcullen children emigrated from Sligo to America. We know for certain that Sarah and Annie moved to San Francisco, married, had children, and died there. John and Dominic also went to America, and perhaps other Kilcullen siblings, as well. In my next post, I'll share the research I'm doing on what happened to the Kilcullens who left Ireland.

Again, a huge thank you to Lorraine and Theresa at the County Sligo Heritage & Genealogy Centre. I had not even hoped to receive this much information about the Kilcullens, who've been unknown to us for so long. I'm very grateful, and I know the cousins who read this will be, too.